7 Best Octoparse Alternatives for Google Maps Scraping (2026)

Octoparse uses a visual builder and templates to collect data from many website types. Its cloud execution and scheduling can be useful when the same team handles directories, ecommerce, and other sources.

If Google Maps is the main source, a dedicated product can remove task-building work. G Maps Crawl now supports hosted keyword jobs, saved datasets, contact enrichment, REST, and MCP alongside its browser extension. This guide compares seven alternatives by source coverage, setup, and how the data reaches your team.

Quick Comparison

Prices are in USD; monthly billing is shown unless an annual commitment is stated. Records, API requests, export credits, and infrastructure credits are different billing units. Follow each pricing link for current limits and terms.

How We Chose These Octoparse Alternatives

This list mixes focused Google Maps tools, visual scraper builders, browser scrapers, sales automation tools, scraping platforms, and developer APIs so you can choose by workflow rather than brand familiarity.

The criteria were:

• Clear relevance to Google Maps scraping, local business data, lead generation, or the next step after a lead list.
• Enough market visibility to be worth evaluating.
• Public product pages, docs, or pricing pages that make the workflow understandable.
• A real reason to choose the product over Octoparse: simpler exports, better Google Maps focus, API-first access, broader automation, stronger enrichment, or enterprise infrastructure.

1. G Maps Crawl

G Maps Crawl replaces visual scraping-task setup with a dedicated Google Maps search workflow. Run hosted keyword jobs and return to saved datasets, use the browser extension for manual collection, or call REST/MCP from your own software.

What G Maps Crawl includes:

• Hosted Online jobs and saved datasets. Submit multiple keywords within your plan's task limit. Jobs continue after you close the browser, and results stay available in your workspace.
• Contact enrichment and flexible exports. Paid Online plans add email and social discovery from business websites, selectable export fields, and CSV, Excel, or JSON files. Contact availability depends on the source.
• Browser collection. The separate Chrome and Edge Extension supports searches and file exports from a browser workflow.
• Synchronous REST search. The Search API returns up to 20 businesses per request as JSON in the same response, without job polling. Optional extra: true requests available website contact enrichment. Test keys return simulated data without live usage.
• MCP and an agent Skill. The MCP server and Google Maps data Skill connect business search to compatible agents. MCP uses your API allowance and returns structured results; it does not provide a file-export or email-sending tool.
• Prospect qualification tools. The website presence finder classifies listing website links, review opportunities filters observed review counts and supports peer comparison when the sample allows it, and the sales territory builder helps qualify businesses and exclude existing accounts.

The business tools show evidence and keep unknown data separate from matches. A missing listing website link does not prove that no website exists. Their public previews inspect up to 100 businesses and display up to 20 rows; adjusting filters reuses the sample. Public previews share up to three accepted requests per UTC day, subject to admission controls.

Search results can include business names, categories, addresses, coordinates, phones, websites, hours, ratings, review counts, and available review and photo data. Online and API do not support standalone review or photo jobs.

Where Octoparse may fit better: Octoparse is more flexible for building visual scraping tasks across unrelated websites and scheduling them. G Maps Crawl focuses on Maps business data and does not offer a general visual workflow builder.

Pricing by product:

• Online: Free includes 1,000 records/month and up to two keywords per task, without contact enrichment or file exports. Lite is $19/month for 20,000 records and up to five keywords per task, including enrichment and CSV/Excel/JSON exports. Higher plans increase the record and keyword allowances.
• Extension: Free includes 1,000 records/month. Professional is $39/month for 100,000; Business is $99/month for 500,000.
• API and MCP: Free includes 20 requests/month. Basic is $15/month for 1,000; Professional is $65/month for 5,000. Paid overage and higher-volume plans are listed on the pricing page.

Online, Extension, and API subscriptions have separate allowances; MCP shares API usage. Online counts accepted unique records, while each successful API search page counts as one request, including an empty page. A request can return fewer than 20 businesses.

Best for: Non-technical users who mainly collect local business data, with REST/MCP available when the workflow needs an integration.

The tradeoff: You get a dedicated Maps collection and qualification workflow. Choose Online, Extension, or API according to how you want to run searches and use the results.

2. ParseHub

ParseHub is a visual web scraping tool for turning dynamic websites into structured data. It is often evaluated by teams that want a point-and-click scraper with cloud execution and exports.

What ParseHub does well:

• Visual project builder for complex pages.
• Works on many dynamic websites beyond Google Maps.
• Free plan for testing smaller projects.
• Cloud execution and scheduling on paid plans.
• Useful for analysts who do not want to maintain code.

Where it is weaker than Octoparse: Compared with Octoparse, ParseHub is less focused on finished Google Maps lead exports. It can be stronger for custom scraping, enrichment, or automation, but it may require more setup before you have a clean prospecting list.

Pricing: A free entry plan and paid options are available. Confirm the current page allowance, execution speed, scheduling, and export limits on the official pricing page before choosing a plan. See official pricing.

Best for: Analysts and operations teams that need a visual scraper for dynamic sites and can spend time configuring projects.

The tradeoff: ParseHub is flexible, but Google Maps lead generation usually needs more setup and cleanup than a dedicated map scraper.

3. Web Scraper

Web Scraper is a popular point-and-click scraping extension for Chrome and Firefox with optional cloud scraping, scheduling, API access, and proxy support.

What Web Scraper does well:

• Free browser extension for local scraping.
• Point-and-click sitemap builder.
• CSV, XLSX, and JSON exports.
• Optional cloud scheduler and API.
• Useful for learning and lightweight extraction tasks.

Where it is weaker than Octoparse: Compared with Octoparse, Web Scraper is less focused on finished Google Maps lead exports. It can be stronger for custom scraping, enrichment, or automation, but it may require more setup before you have a clean prospecting list.

Pricing: The browser extension is free. Cloud pricing is separate and depends on the chosen service and volume. Check the current configuration and quote instead of using an older fixed cloud-plan price. See official pricing.

Best for: Users who want a low-cost browser-based scraper and are comfortable configuring selectors.

The tradeoff: It is flexible but manual. Google Maps lead generation may require more setup and cleaning than a dedicated tool.

4. Apify

Apify is a full web scraping and automation platform with a large Actor marketplace, serverless runs, proxies, datasets, storage, APIs, and webhooks.

What Apify does well:

• Huge marketplace of ready-made Actors.
• Supports custom scraping logic in hosted runs.
• Scheduling, datasets, storage, and webhooks in one platform.
• Good fit for many unrelated scraping targets.
• Developers can build and monetize their own Actors.

Where it is weaker than Octoparse: Compared with Octoparse, Apify is less focused on finished Google Maps lead exports. It can be stronger for custom scraping, enrichment, or automation, but it may require more setup before you have a clean prospecting list.

Pricing: Free includes a small platform allowance. Starter is $19/month plus pay-as-you-go usage. Estimate the selected Actor, compute, proxies, storage, and transfer costs rather than treating the subscription as an unlimited scrape allowance. See official pricing.

Best for: Developers and data teams that need one flexible platform for many scraping and automation jobs.

The tradeoff: Apify is powerful, but it can be more platform than a simple Google Maps lead workflow needs.

5. Bardeen

Bardeen is an AI automation platform for GTM work, web scraping, search, enrichment, and spreadsheet integrations. It is built around agents and reusable automations.

What Bardeen does well:

• AI-assisted workflows for lead sourcing and enrichment.
• Scraping, search, validation, and export actions in one flow.
• Good spreadsheet and workflow integrations.
• Useful for teams that automate many small GTM tasks.
• Lower starting price than many scraping suites.

Where it is weaker than Octoparse: Compared with Octoparse, Bardeen is less focused on finished Google Maps lead exports. It can be stronger for custom scraping, enrichment, or automation, but it may require more setup before you have a clean prospecting list.

Pricing: Plans are credit based, with scraping, contact enrichment, and AI actions consuming credits. Confirm the current package and action costs on the pricing page rather than relying on older Basic or Premium plan names. See official pricing.

Best for: Sales and ops teams that want automation around prospecting, enrichment, and exports.

The tradeoff: Bardeen is a workflow tool. Dedicated Google Maps scraping depth depends on the automations you build.

6. ScraperAPI

ScraperAPI is a scraping API that handles proxies, browsers, CAPTCHA, and request retries so developers can collect data from public websites through a single endpoint.

What ScraperAPI does well:

• Simple API setup for developers.
• Proxy and browser handling abstracted away.
• Good for teams that already write custom crawlers.
• Free credits for testing.
• Scales from small scripts to larger scraping programs.

Where it is weaker than Octoparse: Compared with Octoparse, ScraperAPI is less focused on finished Google Maps lead exports. It can be stronger for custom scraping, enrichment, or automation, but it may require more setup before you have a clean prospecting list.

Pricing: Paid plans start at $49/month with monthly billing. Request credits vary with features and target requirements, so estimate the cost of a representative request rather than comparing credits directly with exported leads. See official pricing.

Best for: Developers who need scraping access infrastructure while keeping extraction code in their own system.

The tradeoff: ScraperAPI is not a no-code Google Maps exporter. It is a lower-level building block.

7. ScrapingBee

ScrapingBee is a web scraping API for developers. It handles JavaScript rendering, headless Chrome, proxy rotation, screenshots, geotargeting, and anti-bot work behind a simple API call.

What ScrapingBee does well:

• Simple API for fetching rendered pages reliably.
• JavaScript rendering and headless browser support.
• Proxy rotation, geotargeting, and screenshots.
• Credit-based pricing that is easy to estimate.
• Good fit for custom scraping code and monitoring workflows.

Where it is weaker than Octoparse: Compared with Octoparse, ScrapingBee is less focused on finished Google Maps lead exports. It can be stronger for custom scraping, enrichment, or automation, but it may require more setup before you have a clean prospecting list.

Pricing: The trial includes 1,000 API credits. Hobby is $19/month for 75,000 credits. Rendering, premium proxies, and dedicated endpoints can use different credit amounts, so credits are not equivalent to business records. See official pricing.

Best for: Developers who need scraping infrastructure without managing browsers, proxies, and anti-bot handling themselves.

The tradeoff: ScrapingBee gives developers infrastructure, but it does not turn Google Maps into a lead list without custom extraction logic.

When You Should Stay With Octoparse

Stay with Octoparse if you want one no-code scraper for many website types and your team is comfortable building and maintaining scraping tasks.

No alternatives list should pretend that the seed product is never the right choice. Octoparse may still be the best fit if its current workflow, pricing model, integrations, and data coverage already match your team.

Which Octoparse Alternative Should You Choose?

Choose G Maps Crawl if your source is Google Maps and you want hosted keyword jobs, saved datasets, paid enrichment and exports, or REST/MCP without building a visual scraping task.

Choose ParseHub if you want a visual scraper for dynamic websites and are comfortable configuring projects.

Choose Web Scraper if you want a low-cost browser extension and can configure selectors manually.

Choose Apify if you need an Actor marketplace and hosted automation for many websites.

Choose Bardeen if your GTM team wants AI-assisted scraping, enrichment, and spreadsheet automations.

Choose ScraperAPI if you already write extraction code and need proxy-backed request infrastructure.

Choose ScrapingBee if developers need rendering, proxies, screenshots, and raw page access behind an API.

Recommendation

Choose G Maps Crawl for a dedicated Google Maps workflow with hosted jobs, saved datasets, prospecting tools, paid enriched exports, and REST/MCP. The browser extension remains an option for hands-on collection.

Keep Octoparse, ParseHub, or Web Scraper on the shortlist when visual configuration across multiple websites matters. Apify and Bardeen cover broader automation, while ScraperAPI and ScrapingBee help developers implement their own collection logic.